DISCUSSION: The author doesn’t say how the issue of email privacy should be resolved. The passage is a neutral description of the issue.
The most we can say is that the author finds the issue interesting enough to have written four paragraphs about it, with sophisticated arguments.
___________
- To pick this, you’d have to find a line where the author said “interception is wrong”, or something like that.
- The opposite of A. To pick this, you’d need a line that said “interception is right”.
- The author never expressed sympathy for the employees. They just told us the result of the court case.
- CORRECT. This answer is a bit of a cop-out. But it’s true that the author must find the issues interesting. Otherwise, why would they have written four well researched paragraphs?
- The author is neutral, not cynical. And motives are never mentioned. We don’t know why employers intercept email.
Want a free Reading Comp lesson?
Get a free sample of the Reading Comprehension Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving RC questions
Leave a Reply