LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 3 › Logical Reasoning › Question 15

LSAT 3 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q15

LSAT Preptest 3 explanations

LR Question 15 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Exctinction is the way of nature. Scientists estimate that…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Humans are not to blame for recent species extinctions (the species would have become extinct anyway.)

REASONING: Most species were extinct before humans even existed. (therefore recent extinctions must have been caused by something other than humans)

ANALYSIS: This is a terrible argument. Life on Earth existed for a long time before humans did. Lots of extinctions happened, but they happened very slowly. Since we’ve been around, extinctions have happened quickly.

This is bringing in outside knowledge, of course. It’s fine to bring in outside knowledge to help you understand the context of a question. The only thing that isn’t fine is to make an assumption that contradicts the stimulus or that isn’t supported by the stimulus.

___________

  1. The argument is only about extinction. The author might believe that technology has harmed other aspects of the environment.
  2. This is relevant only if we have some strong reason to believe that the species about to become extinct will be killed by humans. The author would probably claim that any new extinctions are also caused by natural forces.
  3. How does this affect the argument that humans did not kill species that have gone extinct?
  4. The author was talking about a general scientific consensus. He did not cite specific scientists. If we’re making an argument, we don’t have to disagree with ourselves at every sentence.
  5. CORRECT. This is a fancy way of saying that the author didn’t provide any evidence to show that we didn’t kill the species that have gone extinct since we existed. Obviously we didn’t kill the species that went extinct before we existed. But we might have killed modern species. The author doesn’t give any evidence that we didn’t.

Recap: The question begins with “Exctinction is the way of nature Scientists estimate that”. It is a Flawed Reasoning question. Learn how to master LSAT Flaw questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 3
Next Question

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms