LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 3 › Logical Reasoning › Question 21

LSAT 3 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

LSAT Preptest 3 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United States…

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

ANALYSIS: I personally think Thomas is being dense. It’s pretty obvious what Leona means: some people who would have died an egg related death will now either live or die for some other reason. They won’t die from eggs: their lives are safe from the egg menace.

The early LSAT was a lot more literal than the present LSAT. It is possible to be so logical as to be an idiot.

We must explain to Thomas that Leona wasn’t speaking according to the strict logical meaning of her words. Instead, she was speaking like a normal human being fluent in English. She meant that 5,000 fewer people will die egg related deaths each year. It does not necessarily mean that all of them will survive for ten full years: the population might not be a full 50,000 higher.

___________

  1. No one even mentioned population growth. Thomas is concerned with the death rate. He keeps everything else equal by saying “[lower] than it otherwise would have been.”
  2. CORRECT. This is confusing to read but all it means is that 5,000 fewer people die from eggs each year. Even if they later die for other reasons their lives were “saved” from an egg-related demise.
  3. This is true, but it doesn’t address the whole issue. Leona already mentioned that “an estimated 5,000 lives might be saved.” She was pretty explicit that the number was just an estimate and could be different in real life.
  4. Thomas is mainly concerned with changes in the death rate. He keeps everything else equal by saying “[lower] than it otherwise would have been.”
  5. This doesn’t clear up anything. Thomas’ objection didn’t have to do with how we could cut egg consumption in half. He was concerned about the consequences.

Recap: The question begins with “Leona: If the average consumption of eggs in the United States”. It is a Strengthen question. Learn how to master LSAT Strengthen questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 3
Next Question

More Resources for Strengthen Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms