LSATHacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • LSAT Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Mastery Courses
  • Login
  •   Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 30 › Logical Reasoning 1 › Question 15

LSAT 30, Logical Reasoning I, Q15, LSATHacks

LSAT 30 Explanations

LR Question 15 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: During the recent economic downturn, banks contributed…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: Banks will lend more money if those standards are relaxed.

REASONING: Banks contributed to the downturn by loaning less money. And prior to the downturn, regulatory standards for banks were tightened. 

ANALYSIS: This is a bad argument. It make a causation-correlation error. Just because one thing happened first (regulatory tightening) doesn’t mean that it caused another thing (loaning less money.) 

 It’s quite possible that the regulatory tightening hardly causes any change in loan policies. Banks may have simply been loaning less because they always loan less in hard times. 

___________

  1. CORRECT. If the downturn caused a massive decrease in bank funds then banks might not have anything to lend even if regulatory standards are relaxed. 
  2. Actually the argument seems to implying that the standards were a cause.
  3. The argument cares about the effects of the regulatory standards. The reasons for them are irrelevant. 
  4. This assumption flatly contradicts the information in the stimulus. It can’t be true.
  5. Why would this assumption be necessary? The argument is stronger if relaxing the standards could cause so much loaning that the downturn was reversed. 

Previous Question
PT 30 /  PT 111
Next Question

More Resources for Necessary Assumption Questions

  • Negations Article: Learn about negations on the LSAT.
  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • Negations Drill: Practice your negation skills.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Necessary Assumption questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers necessary assumption questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Free Five Part LSAT Email Course

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Levi says

    January 2, 2025 at 3:20 pm

    I’m failing to see how D contradicts the stimulus. It states normally there would be no dip in loans during a downturn. In this case, it is because of regulation not the banks, therefore wiping the regulation would bring back good loan values. The no statement only relates to the effects of an economic downturn and not the regulation itself, as it is not mentioned in the answer choice. I may be overthinking this.

    Does the no statement also take regulation into regard in answer D? or is it considered a sort of separate issue?

    Reply
    • Tutor Aaminah_LSATHacks says

      January 16, 2025 at 4:40 pm

      I’m not entirely sure I’m following your line of reasoning. I’ll build on Graeme’s explanation. D contradicts the stimulus because it essentially says downturns are NEVER accompanied by a decrease in bank loans. The stimulus, however, tells us that banks contributed to the recent downturn by loaning less money. So the stimulus already shows us an example of exactly what D is saying never happens.

      In terms of regulation, yes the stimulus says regulations are why bank loaned less money. But that’s just the reasoning. The outcome is still less loans, which still means D directly contradicts the statement that “banks contributed to the decline by loaning less money.” Hopefully that clarifies things, but let me know if you have any further questions!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Ultimate Bundle

Get the LSATHacks Mastery seminars, the Intro Course, the LSATHacks Mastery Toolkit and a Strategy Call. All for only $499, satisfaction guaranteed.

Buy now

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial
  • FAQ/Legal

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2025 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal