LSAT 30, Reading Comprehension, Q16, LSATHacks

RC Question 16 Explanation, by LSATHacks

DISCUSSION: The game is an example. It demonstrates that we might dislike a system even if it produces clear results.

___________

1. What principle? What previous application? Don’t choose answers like this unless you can answer those questions. (You can’t, here)
2. CORRECT. The point is, something can be clear without being good. 
3. How does an example about robbery demonstrate unimportance? And which activity? Meyerson isn’t saying the law is unimportant. 
4. The point isn’t to contrast robbery with the law. Robbery is given as an example to demonstrate a point about the law.
5. Meyerson is dismissing the CLS proponents’ idea. But she doesn’t say their idea is reprehensible. She just thinks it’s wrong, and uses the robbery game as an example to prove their point. 

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

Founder of LSAThacks; I scored a 177 on the LSAT.

I created the LSAT Mastery Seminars, which are part of the Ultimate LSAT Prep Bundle

If you like the explanations you're reading I'm 100% confident you'll enjoy the courses. Satisfaction guaranteed.

---------
Updates:

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.