LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 109 › Logical Reasoning › Question 22

LSAT 109 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q22

LSAT Preptest 109 explanations

LR Question 22 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: If relativity theory is correct, no object can travel forward in…

QUESTION TYPE: Parallel Reasoning

CONCLUSION: If relativity theory is correct then either quantum mechanics’ prediction about tachyons is wrong or tachyons do not travel forward in time.

REASONING: Relativity theory says that nothing can travel forward in time faster than the speed of light. But quantum mechanics predicts that tachyons travel in time faster than the speed of light.

ANALYSIS: This is a good argument. If relativity is correct then tachyons cannot travel forward in time faster than the speed of light. So either they travel backwards or they don’t travel faster than the speed of light (i.e. the prediction was wrong, in one of two ways.)

The structure is: If A is true then either B is wrong or B is only true in a counterintuitive sense that doesn’t contradict A.

___________

  1. This is just a description of a magazine article. It isn’t really a conclusive argument because it hasn’t examined whether there is other evidence in favor of the theory that English is descended from Proto-Indo-European. 
  2. This is a bad argument. It shows that the defendant had either of the two necessary conditions for being guilty. But they aren’t sufficient conditions for showing his guilt.
  3. CORRECT. If A is true (modern medicine) then either B is wrong (the witness is mistaken) or B is only true in a counterintuitive sense that doesn’t contradict A (the shaman was underground but his brain had oxygen.) 
  4. This isn’t a good argument, because it hasn’t examined the strength of the evidence that shows Alexander might have been buried in Alexandria instead.
  5. This isn’t a good argument, because it hasn’t shown whether big bang theory is in fact correct. 
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 109
Next Question

More Resources for Parallel Reasoning Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Parallel Reasoning questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers parallel reasoning questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms