LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 109 › Logical Reasoning › Question 23

LSAT 109 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q23

LSAT Preptest 109 explanations

LR Question 23 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Maria won this year’s local sailboat race by beating…

QUESTION TYPE: Sufficient Assumption

CONCLUSION: Maria trained hard.

REASONING: Maria beat Sue, the winner of the last four races.

ANALYSIS: This is a bad argument. We don’t know how many people were in the race, how well Sue performed, if Sue’s boat sank, etc. We don’t even know if training is even necessary for a sailboat race.

The correct answer shows that training is a necessary condition for winning.

___________

  1. This could mean that neither of them trained hard. 
  2. This doesn’t tell us that if Maria won the boat race then she trained hard.
  3. CORRECT. The only way to win was to train hard. And Maria did win. So Maria must have trained hard. 
  4. This definitely doesn’t tell us whether Maria trained hard.
  5. This doesn’t have anything to do with training. 
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 109
Next Question

More Resources for Sufficient Assumption Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Sufficient Assumption questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers sufficient assumption questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Levi says

    December 18, 2024 at 3:10 pm

    I got the answer correct, however I want to be sure my reasoning is correct.
    B. States training as a sufficient condition. It is not required, it would simply be enough.
    C. States training as a necessary condition, and we’re looking for necessary as it guarantees training to happen.
    Right?

    Reply
    • Aaminah_LSATHacks says Tutor

      December 19, 2024 at 1:33 pm

      Yes, your reasoning is correct!

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms