• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

LSAT Hacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • Start Here
    • About
  • LSAT Explanations
  • LSAT Courses
  • Tutoring
    • Tutoring
    • Mastery seminars
    • Course
    • Books
  • Blog
  • Login
LSAT Explanations » LSAT Preptest 34 » Logical Reasoning 2 » Question 9

LSAT 34, Logical Reasoning II, Q9, LSATHacks

LSAT 34 Explanations

LR Question 9 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: Lines can be parallel in a Euclidean…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: There are no parallel lines in our universe, if those physicists are right.

REASONING: The non-Euclidean system of geometry with the most empirical verification (real world proof) is seen by some physicists think it accurately describes our universe.

Euclidean geometry can have parallel lines.

ANALYSIS: The argument didn’t tell us whether or not the non-Euclidean system can have parallel lines. A necessary assumption is that they cannot.

___________

  1. CORRECT. If there are parallel lines in the system then this argument is wrong. 
  2. This just tells us that more physicists think the system is correct. But that doesn’t tell us whether or not our universe has parallel lines or what the geometry system is like. So this isn’t necessary.
  3. This would be a sufficient assumption. But it’s only necessary that the particular non-Euclidean system in question has no parallel lines. 
  4. This isn’t necessary. The argument was describing what would be true if the physicists were correct. It was not arguing that the physicists were necessarily correct.
  5. It doesn’t matter how many physicists think the system is correct. The argument isn’t claiming that the system is correct. Instead, it’s telling us what would be true if the system were correct. 

Previous Question
Table Of Contents
Next Question




Free Logical Reasoning lesson

Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.

Check out LSATHacks All Access

It's your one stop shop for LSAT prep: 1000s more explanations, and courses for both intro and advanced students. Lifetime access to everything on LSATHacks and anything I add. Plus a consult with me to get you started on the right track.
---------
Socials and Updates: If you have any questions, you can can check out my TikTok videos or email me.

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


New! LSATHacks All Access: Get every course on LSATHacks + members only explanations

LSATHacks Pro

Get a higher score with LSATHacks

LSAT Course, LSAT Mastery seminars, and 3,000 extra explanations. All for only $760 $349, satisfaction guaranteed. Sign up here: https://lsathacks.com/all-access/

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

© Copyright 2023 LSAT Hacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal

Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.
×
Item Added to your Cart!
There are no products
Continue Shopping