• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

LSAT Hacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • Start Here
    • About
  • LSAT Explanations
  • LSAT Courses
  • Tutoring
    • Tutoring
    • Mastery seminars
    • Course
    • Books
  • Blog
  • Login
LSAT Explanations » LSAT Preptest 36 » Logical Reasoning 1 » Question 26

LSAT 36, Logical Reasoning I, Q26, LSATHacks

LSAT 36 Explanations

LR Question 26 Explanation, by LSATHacks

QUESTION TEXT: In the paintings by seventeenth-century Dutch artist…

QUESTION TYPE: Sufficient Assumption

CONCLUSION: Vermeer was not constrained by lack of props. He could have had as many props as he wished.

REASONING: Vermeer used few props, but they were expensive. 

ANALYSIS: “Dearth” means lack of. The correct answer tells us that if the lack of props caused the lack of variety then we wouldn’t have seen expensive props.

But we did see expensive props in the paintings. So there must not have been a lack of props. 

___________

  1. This could actually weaken the argument by showing the Vermeer lacked props.
  2. This doesn’t support the idea that Vermeer had access to many other props as well. Maybe he only had a few.
  3. This could support the idea that Vermeer didn’t have access to many props. The ones he used came from family.
  4. This could explain why Vermeer used those items. But it doesn’t explain why he didn’t also use other items, and it doesn’t let us prove that Vermeer had easy access to other props.
  5. CORRECT. We did see expensive props, so this answer choice tells us there was no “dearth.” 

Previous Question
Table Of Contents




Free Logical Reasoning lesson

Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.

Check out LSATHacks All Access

It's your one stop shop for LSAT prep: 1000s more explanations, and courses for both intro and advanced students. Lifetime access to everything on LSATHacks and anything I add. Plus a consult with me to get you started on the right track.
---------
Socials and Updates: If you have any questions, you can can check out my TikTok videos or email me.

For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


New! LSATHacks All Access: Get every course on LSATHacks + members only explanations

LSATHacks Pro

Get a higher score with LSATHacks

LSAT Course, LSAT Mastery seminars, and 3,000 extra explanations. All for only $760 $349, satisfaction guaranteed. Sign up here: https://lsathacks.com/all-access/

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

© Copyright 2023 LSAT Hacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal

Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.
×
Item Added to your Cart!
There are no products
Continue Shopping