LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 112 › Logical Reasoning › Question 21

LSAT 112 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

LSAT Preptest 112 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Sandy: I play the Bigbucks lottery-that’s the one…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

DESCRIPTION OF THE GAME: Five numbers are drawn. If you pick the five numbers, you’ll win the pot. There is not a winner every week: someone only wins if their numbers are picked.

ARGUMENTS: Sandy says it’s best to play after there has been no winner for a bit. There’s more money to be won.

Alex thinks that it will be harder to win because there are more players.

ANALYSIS: Alex is wrong. How likely you are to pick the winning five numbers is not affected by the number of players.

Alex said you’re less likely to win with more players. That’s incorrect. You have a 1-in-100,000 chance of winning each week, no matter how many people play (you don’t need to calculate these odds of to answer the question, of course.) Multiple people can pick the winning number. That doesn’t reduce your odds.

Even if you were the only one playing you would still lose for 99,999 weeks for every week you won.

If you had to pick a number between one and ten and you win 2$ if you guess right, your odds of winning aren’t affected by how many people play.

___________

  1. Sandy didn’t say that. Sandy just said it’s smart to wait for a bigger pot.
  2. CORRECT. Alex is mistaken: the odds of picking five numbers correctly never change.
  3. Sandy didn’t say anything about the odds of winning. He just talked about how big the pot would be if you did win.
  4. If Alex had said this, he would have been correct. The odds of winning in any given week are unaffected by whether anyone won the previous week.
  5. Show me where Sandy talked about the odds of winning. He only talked about how big the prize would be.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 112
Next Question

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Julia says

    February 3, 2025 at 11:46 pm

    You use “he” to describe Sandy and Alex, which made me realize that both of the names are gender neutral in this question. (I was picturing both Alex and Sandy as women.) Funny how internal bias works, lol!

    Reply
  2. Sandra Masoud says

    April 1, 2023 at 8:56 pm

    The stimulus says that all players who have picked the five numbers drawn share the money pot, doesn’t that mean that Alex is correct since the smaller the number of winners, the money each person gets?

    Reply
    • Graeme Blake says Founder

      April 3, 2023 at 7:28 am

      No, you’re thinking about how much money you win. But “winning the lottery” strictly speaking means getting all the numbers right and winning the biggest prize on offer.

      Your odds are based on numbers not prize size. So, like if we have two people

      One week: $100 million jackpot —> winner wins the lottery
      Next week: tiny $100,000 depleted prize —> winner still wins the lottery

      Obviously more *money* for the first lottery winner but they are both lottery winners.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms