QUESTION TEXT: Skeletal remains of early humans indicate clearly that…
QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen
CONCLUSION: The diet of early humans was very different from ours.
REASONING: They had fewer dental problems than we did.
ANALYSIS: The argument assumes that dental problems, or the lack of them, indicate something meaningful about diet. But it doesn’t actually support that link. If someone said: “Dental records don’t reflect diet at all”, the whole argument would collapse. So to strengthen it, we need a reason to believe dental health and diet are connected.
___________
- Healthy teeth would have no problems, while early humans had some problems (“fewer”). So they weren’t necessarily eating “healthy.” The conclusion only claims they were eating differently.
- Always remember: “some” could mean 1-2 skeletons. It won’t do anything except disprove the statement “No early humans had a lot of cavities.”
- That’s nice, but we’re trying to conclude their diet was different, not similar.
- This would weaken the argument, showing that it wasn’t diet but age that caused the smaller number of cavities.
- CORRECT. Yes. This means that differing levels of cavities indicate that diet likely differed as well.
Recap: The question begins with “Skeletal remains of early humans indicate clearly that”. It is a Strengthen question. Learn more about LSAT Strengthen questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.
More Resources for Strengthen Questions
- Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Strengthen questions.
- Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers strengthen questions.

Leave a Reply