LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 126 › Logical Reasoning › Question 2

LSAT 126 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q2

LSAT Preptest 126 explanations

LR Question 2 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: It is well documented that people have positive responses…

QUESTION TYPE: Role in Argument

CONCLUSION: People’s responses to words depend on their sound as well as their meaning.

REASONING: This is a good argument. It gives us two facts. People have conditioned responses to words. Interestingly, we also have preset responses to nonsensical words such as “blegearch” and “splurf.” This adequately supports the conclusion.

ANALYSIS: The question asks what role the nonsense word claim plays in the argument. It serves as evidence.

The conclusion is that word responses are shaped not just by meaning, but also by sound. Since nonsense words have no meaning, yet still provoke reactions, that supports the idea that sound plays an independent role. So the point about nonsense words functions as a premise directly supporting the conclusion.

___________

  1. The conclusion does not say we have positive or negative responses to any word. The stimulus only tells us that we react to “many” nonsense words.
  2. This gets it backwards. If you have trouble identifying which is which, keep an eye out for phrases such as “this shows,” which usually indicate a conclusion, including in this case.
  3. This is not a generalization; the study examined specific words. The conclusion makes a generalization based on this evidence. Further, this premise certainly doesn’t depend on support from what we know about meaningful words.
  4. CORRECT. Yes. This leads directly to the conclusion when we combine it with the first premise. We can figure out the final sentence is the conclusion because it says “this shows.”
  5. This isn’t the conclusion, and the stimulus doesn’t claim that our reactions in experimental situations are different from those in everyday life.

Recap: The question begins with “It is well documented that people have positive responses”. It is a Role in Argument question. Learn more about LSAT Role questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 126
Next Question

More Resources for Role in Argument Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Role in Argument questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers role in argument questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms