LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 126 › Logical Reasoning › Question 3

LSAT 126 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q3

LSAT Preptest 126 explanations

LR Question 3 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: People with high blood pressure are generally more nervous…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Nervous and anxious people are likely to develop high blood pressure.

REASONING: People with high blood pressure are more likely to be nervous and anxious, so it must be the cause of high blood pressure.

ANALYSIS: This question treats correlation as causation, a common error on the LSAT. Just because two things occur together doesn’t mean one is the cause of the other. And even if one is the cause of the other, we don’t know which one. High blood pressure could cause people to feel anxious.

Firemen are often seen at the scene of fires. Does this mean they cause fires? (Maybe if they’re corrupt, and looking for more work….I guess)

You can never make a definite conclusion on the mere basis of a correlation.

___________

  1. The stimulus does define hypertensive personality: someone nervous and anxious.
  2. The argument doesn’t claim personality can’t change, only that if you happen to be nervous and anxious, you will likely suffer from high blood pressure.
  3. It’s pretty clear these people exist; the first sentence tells us that people with high blood pressure generally are nervous and anxious. The use of the term “hypertensive personality” simply gives us a name for them.
  4. CORRECT. Here we go. As I wrote above, it’s an error of assuming correlation means causation. All correlation can tell us is that there may be a relationship worth investigating.
  5. This isn’t their error. They’re merely proposing these two traits as a cause; they are not claiming that there are no other traits which could also be a cause.

Recap: The question begins with “People with high blood pressure are generally more nervous”. It is a Flawed Reasoning question. Learn how to master LSAT Flaw questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 126
Next Question

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms