LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 116 › Logical Reasoning › Question 13

LSAT 116 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q13

LSAT Preptest 116 explanations

LR Question 13 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Up until about 2 billion years ago, the sun was 30 percent…

QUESTION TYPE: Paradox

ANALYSIS: We know three things:

  1. The sun was 30% dimmer as recently as 2 billion years ago. Take note that the stimulus says “up until about 2 billions years ago”, meaning that it was dim much earlier than 2 billion years ago as well.
  2. If the sun were that dim today, the oceans would be frozen.
  3. Yet 3.8 billion years ago, the oceans were not frozen.

Common sense is important here. The sun is not the only thing that heats the earth…otherwise we would be much colder at night. Think back to science class, and note that heat from the earth’s core and heat retained by the atmosphere are also important.

___________

  1. CORRECT. This resolves the paradox. If the atmosphere held more heat 3.8 billion years ago, then less sunlight would be required to keep the oceans from freezing.
  2. This is tempting, but since the stimulus says the sun was dim “up until about 2 billion years ago,” it implies it was also dim earlier than that, including 3.8 billion years ago.
  3. This doesn’t explain why there was liquid 3.8 billion years ago. Also note that “contributed to” is very vague, and could be a miniscule contribution.
  4. This tells us nothing. Certain regions of ocean are still frozen today, such as the Arctic. The main point is that 3.8 billion years ago there was some liquid capable of supporting life.
  5. This would make the earth even colder, which doesn’t help explain why there was unfrozen liquid.

Recap: The question begins with “Up until about 2 billion years ago, the sun was 30 percent”. It is a Paradox question. Learn how to master LSAT Paradox questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 116
Next Question

More Resources for Paradox Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Paradox questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers paradox questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms