LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 135 › Logical Reasoning › Question 13

LSAT 135 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q13

LSAT Preptest 135 explanations

LR Question 13 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Educator: Reducing class sizes in our school district…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: Smaller classes probably wouldn’t improve education.

REASONING: To reduce class sizes, we need to hire teachers. There aren’t enough qualified teachers in the region. Bad teachers don’t improve education.

ANALYSIS: This sounds like a good argument. But, the educator only says there’s a shortage of qualified teachers in the region. There might be qualified teachers in other areas. The school district could hire those teachers. Then the district could decrease class sizes and maintain quality. This argument has to assume that it’s not possible to hire qualified teachers from other regions.

___________

  1. The educator didn’t say whether we should reduce class sizes. He just said that reducing class sizes probably wouldn’t improve education.
    Negation: “It might be a good idea to reduce class sizes even if achievement didn’t increase.”
  2. This would be needed if we were arguing that we could use smaller classes to improve outcomes.
    Negation: “No qualified teachers could improve education if class sizes were reduced”
  3. The argument is about a fact: whether or not smaller classes could improve education. This answer addresses public opinion. Fact and public opinion are unrelated. What students think has no effect on whether smaller classes will work.
    Negation: “Students place at least as much value on class size as on qualified teachers.”
  4. This says that unqualified teachers will help NO ONE. To test an answer, negate it only slightly. If it’s the right answer, even the slightest negation will destroy the argument. The negation here is not significant to overall education quality.
    Negation: “Unqualified teachers might help one or two students”.
  5. CORRECT. If we could relocate large numbers of qualified teachers, then the local shortage isn’t a problem.
    Negation: “We could relocate significant numbers of qualified teachers from other regions.”
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 135
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Timothy Glenn says

    December 12, 2018 at 10:46 pm

    So flying you to florida for a couple of days? Would this suffice!?

    Reply
  2. Aray says

    May 6, 2018 at 2:51 am

    Graeme, thanks for your amazing explanations. This website is such a great resource.

    Just wanted to ask if you meant to say, “then the district could DECREASE class sizes and maintain quality” ?

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      September 1, 2018 at 7:56 pm

      Yes, that’s correct! Thanks for catching this. The page has been updated.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms