LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 140 › Logical Reasoning › Question 10

LSAT 140 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q10

LSAT Preptest 140 explanations

LR Question 10 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Company president: Whenever you subcontract the…

QUESTION TYPE: Must Be True

FACTS:

  1. Subcontract ➞ Lose control
  2. Contrapositive: Lose control ➞ Subcontract
  3. The company only subcontracts with companies that maintain control

ANALYSIS: We have a conditional statement (facts 1 and 2) and a fact (fact 3). You can combine them. The stimulus says that the companies the president uses for outsourcing don’t lose control. According to the contrapositive above, those companies therefore don’t subcontract.

Several wrong answers bring in outside assumptions about outsourcing being poor quality. The stimulus doesn’t support this. If you outsource, you lose control over quality, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the quality is lower. It just means you don’t control whether or not quality is high.

___________

  1. CORRECT. This must be true. If the subcontractors were allowed to subcontract, then they would lose some control. Since the subcontractors don’t lose control, we know they don’t subcontract.
  2. The stimulus never talks about disappointment. This answer is trying to make you bring in outside assumptions about outsourcing and poor quality.
  3. This has to be false. If the company’s president wanted full control, then they wouldn’t outsource. You always lose control when you outsource.
  4. This is similar to B. This might be true in real life, but nothing in the stimulus tells us that subcontracting leads to poor quality. We only know it leads to loss of control, which is not the same thing.
  5. Careful. Loss of control doesn’t necessarily mean loss of quality. We only know subcontracting leads to less control.
    Also note that this says uniformly better quality. That’s a strong statement – it means every single in house product is better (i.e. there are zero duds).

Recap: The question begins with “Company president: Whenever you subcontract the “. It is a Must Be True question. To practice more Must Be True questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 140
Next Question

More Resources for Must Be True Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements on the LSAT.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: This intro course lesson covers conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Must Be True questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers must be true questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Kate says

    September 25, 2014 at 7:02 pm

    I incorrectly chose answer C. What was going through my mind was not that the president wanted full control, but as much of it as he can get. And when he needs to outsource, he makes sure that they don’t outsource as well, retaining as much control as he can.

    If the second sentence the president states went something like when we absolutely have to subcontract, we make sure that company maintains complete control over the quality of the products they supply, would C be closer to correct? Because while he would be losing some control by subcontracting, he is retaining as much control as he can by not allowing the subcontractors to subcontract?

    Thank you in advance!

    Reply
    • Graeme Blake says Founder

      September 25, 2014 at 7:40 pm

      Either way, subcontracting is a loss of control. C isn’t a good choice because if the president wanted C (complete control) then she wouldn’t subcontract, period.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms