LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 140 › Logical Reasoning › Question 3

LSAT 140 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q3

LSAT Preptest 140 explanations

LR Question 3 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: When chimpanzees become angry at other chimpanzees…

QUESTION TYPE: Paradox

PARADOX: Chimpanzee anger can lead to both threat gestures and attacks. But threat gestures are rarely followed by attacks, and attacks rarely are preceded by threat gestures.

ANALYSIS: You might wonder why the stimulus says both of these things:

  • Attacks rarely come after threat gestures.
  • Attacks are rarely preceded by threat gestures.

These sound similar, but they are very different. The first refers to the odds of an attack, if you have a threat gesture. The second refers to the odds that a threat gesture occurred, if there was an attack.

Let’s imagine two situations:

  • 1,000 threat gesture incidents, 10 attacks, all attacks preceded by threat gestures
  • 1,000 threat gesture incidents, 500 attacks, only 30 attacks preceded by threat gestures

In the first situation, it’s true that attacks rarely come after threat gestures. But attacks are always preceded by threat gestures. So the first situation contradicts the second fact.

The second situation is consistent with both facts. Attacks rarely come after threat gestures. And threat gestures rarely come before attacks.

___________

  1. This explains why chimps make threat gestures, but it doesn’t explain why chimps don’t attack.
  2. CORRECT. Threat gestures prevent chimps from having to make attacks. This explains why attacks rarely are preceded by threat gestures – if the chimps had made threat gestures then they wouldn’t have felt angry enough to attack.
  3. Suppose chimpanzees also display aggression by making funny faces. How does that explain anything about attacks and threat gestures?
  4. This doesn’t explain why chimpanzees don’t attack after making threat gestures.
  5. Tempting, but this statement doesn’t explain why threat gestures don’t lead to attacks. This is just a fact about chimpanzees.

Recap: The question begins with “When chimpanzees become angry at other chimpanzees,”. It is a Paradox question. To practice more Paradox questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 140
Next Question

More Resources for Paradox Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Paradox questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers paradox questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms