LSATHacks

The Explanations That Should Have Come With The LSAT

  • LSAT Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Mastery Courses
  • Login
  •   Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 73 › Reading Comprehension › Question 21

LSAT 73, Reading Comprehension, Q21, LSATHacks

LSAT 73 Explanations

RC Question 21 Explanation, by LSATHacks

DISCUSSION: The passage ends with the author’s critique of Marcuse. The author thinks consumers are able to respond consciously and rationally to ads.

The author has not said that ads are good. Instead, they are only arguing that Marcuse’s critique isn’t a good critique.

___________

  1. CORRECT. This matches the author’s opinion. The author hasn’t said that advertising is a good thing. Instead, their point is that Marcuse’s critique is not a good one.
  2. Nonsense. The entire fourth paragraph criticizes Marcuse. The author doesn’t think Marcuse’s claims are justified. And politics plays no part in this passage.
  3. The passage doesn’t talk about corporate leaders. Presumably, they have some responsibility for ordering ads, but it would be odd to end the passage by focussing on people who had never been mentioned before.
  4. The author never talks about benefits of advertising. This answer has no support.
  5. Marcuse didn’t claim that “few people” are unable or unwilling to distinguish real from false needs. Marcuse claimed that all of us are subject to false needs.

Previous Question
PT 73 /  PT 141
Next Passage

Quick Jump PT Section Que

Free Five Part LSAT Email Course

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Member Sabrina (LSAT Hacks) says

    December 6, 2014 at 6:26 pm

    Hi Josh,

    Lines 49-51 does acknowledge that ads often promise a product will do more than it delivers in reality. However, the following lines go on to say that consumers understand this and can get intentionally find some satisfaction from products, even if it’s not what an ad promised.

    There are a couple of problems with (E). As Graeme points out, it’s not accurately stating what Marcuse claimed. Another problem is that even if it did, it wouldn’t make a very strong conclusion for the passage. The author does not go into a discussion about these exceptions (people who are not rational or informed enough to see ads for what they are). Concluding by mentioning an exception that he did not discuss in depth in the passage would not make much sense!

    Hope that helps!

    Reply
  2. josh says

    December 3, 2014 at 11:02 pm

    Hi. I had chosen E because of lines 49-51. I thought that in a way the author was acknowledging that sometimes people are stumped by these “false necessities.” Any help? Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox


Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Ultimate Bundle

Get the LSATHacks Mastery seminars, the Intro Course, the LSATHacks Mastery Toolkit and a Strategy Call. All for only $499, satisfaction guaranteed.

Buy now

Testimonials

Your emails are tremendously helpful. - Matt

Thanks for the tips! They were very helpful, and even make you feel like you studied a bit. Great insight and would love more! - Haj

Dear Graeme: MUCH MORE PLEASE!! Your explanations are very clear, and you give equal importance to why answers are WRONG, as well as why THE ANSWER is right!! Very well done. Thank you for all your efforts - Tom

These have been awesome. More please!!! - Caillie

The course was immensely helpful and has eased my nerves a lot. - Lovlean

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial
  • FAQ/Legal

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of this site requires official LSAT preptests; the explanations are of no use without the preptests. If you do not have the accompanying preptests, you can find them here: LSAT preptests
LSAT is copyright of LSAC. LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2025 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | FAQ/Legal