LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 141 › Reading Comprehension › Question 21

LSAT 141 | Section 1 | Reading Comprehension: Q21

LSAT Preptest 141 explanations

RC Question 21 Explanation

DISCUSSION: The passage ends with the author’s critique of Marcuse. The author thinks consumers are able to respond consciously and rationally to ads.

The author has not said that ads are good. Instead, they are only arguing that Marcuse’s critique isn’t a good critique.

___________

  1. CORRECT. This matches the author’s opinion. The author hasn’t said that advertising is a good thing. Instead, their point is that Marcuse’s critique is not a good one.
  2. Nonsense. The entire fourth paragraph criticizes Marcuse. The author doesn’t think Marcuse’s claims are justified. And politics plays no part in this passage.
  3. The passage doesn’t talk about corporate leaders. Presumably, they have some responsibility for ordering ads, but it would be odd to end the passage by focussing on people who had never been mentioned before.
  4. The author never talks about benefits of advertising. This answer has no support.
  5. Marcuse didn’t claim that “few people” are unable or unwilling to distinguish real from false needs. Marcuse claimed that all of us are subject to false needs.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 141
Next Passage
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Sabrina (LSAT Hacks) says Member

    December 6, 2014 at 6:26 pm

    Hi Josh,

    Lines 49-51 does acknowledge that ads often promise a product will do more than it delivers in reality. However, the following lines go on to say that consumers understand this and can get intentionally find some satisfaction from products, even if it’s not what an ad promised.

    There are a couple of problems with (E). As Graeme points out, it’s not accurately stating what Marcuse claimed. Another problem is that even if it did, it wouldn’t make a very strong conclusion for the passage. The author does not go into a discussion about these exceptions (people who are not rational or informed enough to see ads for what they are). Concluding by mentioning an exception that he did not discuss in depth in the passage would not make much sense!

    Hope that helps!

    Reply
  2. josh says

    December 3, 2014 at 11:02 pm

    Hi. I had chosen E because of lines 49-51. I thought that in a way the author was acknowledging that sometimes people are stumped by these “false necessities.” Any help? Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms