QUESTION TEXT: Food co-ops are a type of consumer cooperative…
QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning
CONCLUSION: Food co-ops are cheaper than supermarkets.
REASONING: Food co-ops are a type of co-op. Co-ops tend to be cheaper than other stores.
ANALYSIS: This question makes a sort of whole-to-part flaw. It applies a tendency to every individual within a group.
On the whole, consumer co-ops are cheaper. But that doesn’t mean that every type of co-op is cheaper. It’s possible that food co-ops are more expensive on average.
___________
- This actually is a correct argument, assuming that people who own sports cars drive about as much as others, on average. More gasoline per miles * same number of miles = more gas usage.
- This is a different flaw. It ignores an obvious reason people might prefer fresh vegetables: they taste better.
- CORRECT. This matches. Public transit, on average, causes less pollution than private transport. But, a bus will cause some pollution, whereas a bicycle essentially causes none.
So even though bicycles are private transport, they don’t share the average quality of private transport. - This is a different flaw. We could correctly conclude that people are eating more healthful food than before. The flaw here is assuming that any extra purchases of healthful food will automatically happen at health food stores.
- This is a different flaw. It’s like saying “The best way to avoid being drunk is to drink lots of beer, because beer has less alcohol than vodka and alcohol causes drunkenness”.
It’s stupid reasoning but it fails to match the stimulus.
More Resources for Flawed Parallel Reasoning Questions
- Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
- LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
- Flaw drills: Practice identifying flaws.
- Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flawed Parallel Reasoning questions.
- Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flawed parallel reasoning questions.

Answer C did you mean to say bicycles do cause more pollution because they share the characteristic of the group they belong to?
No, bicycles don’t pollute. The argument was TRYING to say they do, but that was a flaw in the argument.