LSAT 82, Logic Game 3, Question 14, LSATHacks

This question says Rivers interviews Ikaba. To solve it, you should refer to the scenarios from the setup:

There are a couple things to note:

• The first scenario is out, as S interviews Ikaba there
• The same investigator interviews GH, so that investigator goes twice. The one that interviews Ikaba goes once.

Thus, if R interviews Ikaba, then that must be the only time R interviews anyone. So, we can say that Ikaba must be third.

Look at scenarios 2 and 3. What happens if Ikaba is third? We know IG can’t go together. So, in both scenarios, G must go first to get away from Ikaba.

B is CORRECT.

Here’s a full drawing of how it looks in scenarios 2 and 3:

You can see none of the other answers have to be true. In fact only even C and D could be true.

Quick Jump PT Section Que