LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 10 › Logical Reasoning › Section 1 › Question 21

LSAT 10 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

LSAT Preptest 10 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: The Japanese haiku is defined as a poem of three lines with …

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: English poets disrespect foreign traditions.

REASONING: They don’t strictly follow the 5-7-5 syllable rule of haikus.

ANALYSIS: That seems like quite a strong assertion. The author observes a change in form and automatically assumes it reflects a lack of respect. What if it’s due to creative adaptation, cultural blending, or linguistic differences? None of these possibilities are considered.

___________

  1. Not the issue here. The author isn’t confusing facts with feelings, they’re just interpreting the action as a sign of disrespect.
  2. CORRECT. The conclusion that English poets disrespect foreign traditions is a broad claim. It’s a clear overgeneralization.
  3. No stereotype is used. The author is commenting on specific poetic behavior, not relying on cultural stereotypes.
  4. That would be a flaw if the argument needed to prove uniqueness, but the author is doing the opposite: generalizing from a single trend. So this misses the point.
  5. Actually, the argument does assume that ignoring the form = disrespect. So this just repeats what the author actually does.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 10
Next Question

Section 1 · Logical Reasoning

9 of 25 explained
  • 1
  • 2, no explanation yet
  • 3, no explanation yet
  • 4, no explanation yet
  • 5, no explanation yet
  • 6, no explanation yet
  • 7, no explanation yet
  • 8, no explanation yet
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11, no explanation yet
  • 12, no explanation yet
  • 13, no explanation yet
  • 14
  • 15, no explanation yet
  • 16, no explanation yet
  • 17, no explanation yet
  • 18, no explanation yet
  • 19
  • 20
  • Q21
  • 22
  • 23, no explanation yet
  • 24
  • 25, no explanation yet
ExplainedNot yet explained

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms