LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 130 › Logical Reasoning › Section 1 › Question 24

LSAT 130 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q24

PT130.S1.Q24

LSAT Preptest 130 explanations

LR Question 24 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: The Kiffer Forest Preserve, in the northernmost part

QUESTION TYPE: Weaken

CONCLUSION: There will be more bears in the valley if we keep the road closed.

REASONING: There is a nature preserve within the valley. The road through the preserve has been closed for eight years. During that time, the population of bears in the preserve has increased.

ANALYSIS: Imagine this as two circles. There is a big circle labelled “valley”. Inside that, there is a smaller circle labelled “preserve”.

The road in the preserve has been closed, and the population of bears in the preserve has increased. Where did those bears come from?

The argument is assuming the bears came from outside the valley. But what if the bears just moved from the big circle (the valley) into the little circle (the preserve). In that case, the road hasn’t increased the population of bears: it has just moved them from the rest of the valley into the preserve.

Two of the answers say “only some”. That implies a minimum and a maximum on a range, such as, say 2%–98%. It’s not exactly like the word “some”, which can go all the way to all.

___________

  1. This is a trap. You might have picked this if you thought “maybe the bears moved from the valley into the preserve”. But for that prephrase, E is a better answer.
    The bears could have migrated from the valley, but this answer is also consistent with migration from outside the valley. We have to take answers at their least helpful.
  2. This strengthens the argument. It shows some of the new bears in the preserve have come from outside the valley.
  3. This strengthens the argument. It shows that at least some of the new bears have come from outside the valley.
  4. This sounds like my prephrase, but it’s not strong enough. This answer is consistent with the following situation.

    • Then: 20,000 in the valley outside the preserve. 1000 in the preserve.
    • Now: 19,999 in the valley outside the preserve. 30,000 in the preserve.
  5. CORRECT. If this is true, then it sounds like bears are just moving from other parts of the valley into the preserve. There has been no actual increase inside the valley as a whole.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 130
Next Question

Section 1 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • Q24
  • 25
  • 26

More Resources for Weaken Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Weaken questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers weaken questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms