LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 130 › Logical Reasoning › Section 1 › Question 7

LSAT 130 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q7

PT130.S1.Q7

LSAT Preptest 130 explanations

LR Question 7 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Although many political candidates object to being made

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Parallel Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Negative advertising helps candidates.

REASONING: Most victorious candidates have been targeted by negative advertising.

ANALYSIS: This argument ignores an obvious alternative explanation: the winning candidates were attacked because they were winning. Why would you waste advertising dollars attacking a loser?

This doesn’t mean the negative advertising helped the candidates. It was a symptom of winning, rather than a cause of winning.

To parallel this, look for a situation where there’s an obvious alternate explanation: the thing being complained about is a side effect of success, rather than its cause.

___________

  1. This isn’t even close. A better analogy would be “Although many people dislike sweating, it turns out it helps people because most of those in good health often sweat.”
    As with C, we also know from outside experience that exercise is helpful. Whereas negative attack ads are generally considered bad, so it would be counterintuitive if they were helpful.
  2. CORRECT. This matches exactly. It is likely that successful actors have harsh reviews because they are successful. Once you are sufficiently high profile, at least some people will dislike you. Harsh reviews are a byproduct of success, but that doesn’t mean a harsh review helps.
  3. This is like A. It simply mentions something people dislike. But, we already know from outside experience that studying is helpful! Whereas it would be counterintuitive if negative attack ads were actually helpful.
  4. This is just a true statement. It’s not a flawed argument!
  5. This is a bad argument, but it makes a different flaw. To be parallel, this would have had to say something like “the sleepiness must actually be helpful…etc.”
    Instead this talks about the sleepiness being acceptable. Which is like saying “hangovers must be good, because you enjoy drinking.”
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 130
Next Question

Section 1 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Q7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26

More Resources for Flawed Parallel Reasoning Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Flaw drills: Practice identifying flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flawed Parallel Reasoning questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flawed parallel reasoning questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms