LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 134 › Logical Reasoning › Section 2 › Question 7

LSAT 134 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q7

PT134.S2.Q7

LSAT Preptest 134 explanations

LR Question 7 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Inertia affects the flow of water pumped through a closed system …

QUESTION TYPE: Most Strongly Supported

FACTS:

  • Inertia affects how water starts and stops flowing through pipes.
  • When the pump is turned on, the water doesn’t immediately reach full speed.
  • When the pump is turned off, the water doesn’t immediately stop.
  • The effects of inductance in electrical circuits are similar to the effects of inertia in water pipes.

ANALYSIS: Don’t be intimidated by big words like inertia and inductance. Knowing what they mean isn’t crucial to figuring out this stimulus. But if you come across words you don’t know, always look them up when you’re reviewing! It pays off to have a bigger vocabulary.

So inertia affects the flow of water. It changes how the water acts when you turn the pump on and off.

The last sentence is the key. It tells us that inductance has similar effects in electrical circuits. If that’s true, then the most we can conclude is that inductance affects the flow of electrical current.

Be careful not to push the analogy further than the stimulus does.

___________

  1. CORRECT. This is exactly what the analogy supports. Water flow is affected by inertia. Electrical current should be similarly affected by inductance.
  2. The stimulus compares inductance to inertia. It does not say electrical current involves inertia.
  3. The stimulus never says the pump’s electrical circuits cause the water’s inertia. It simply compares two separate phenomena.
  4. There’s no discussion of what engineers do.
  5. Water flow decreases gradually, but that does not mean the pump keeps pumping after it’s switched off. That’s adding a fact that isn’t in the stimulus.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 134
Next Question

Section 2 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Q7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

More Resources for Most Strongly Supported Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Most Strongly Supported questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers most strongly supported questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms