QUESTION TEXT: Warner: Until recently, most competitive swimmers were high school …
QUESTION TYPE: Method of Reasoning
ARGUMENTS: WARNER’S ARGUMENT: Swimmers now compete longer than before, so training must have improved.
YOUNG’S ARGUMENT: Not necessarily. No one can be both a competitive swimmer and have a job, but now competitive swimming is a job.
ANALYSIS: Young is providing a different explanation. Before, people probably had to quit competitive swimming to go get a job so they could support themselves as adults. Now, you can make a living from competitive swimming, so you don’t have to quit to get a job. So Young is saying this phenomenon might have nothing to do with training.
___________
- Young accepts the facts but offers a different explanation.
- No specific counterexample is given. Young does not describe a particular swimmer or situation.
- This is about confusing sufficient and necessary conditions, which is not what is happening here.
- There’s no accusation of circular reasoning.
- CORRECT. Young provides an alternative explanation for why swimmers are competing longer.
More Resources for Method of Reasoning Questions
- Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Method of Reasoning questions.
- Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers method of reasoning questions.

Leave a Reply