LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 152 › Logical Reasoning › Section 4 › Question 11

LSAT 152 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q11

PT152.S4.Q11

LSAT Preptest 152 explanations

LR Question 11 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: To be considered for this year’s Gillespie Grant …

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Mary will only be considered if she mails her application 10 days before the deadline.

REASONING: Applications must be received by October 1, and mail can take up to 10 days.

ANALYSIS: Have you ever ordered something online and they tell you it’ll be delivered in 3-7 days? 2 days later, joy! It’s been delivered.

Same thing goes here. Mail takes up to 10 days. It’s not guaranteed to take 10 days, it can take less.

So it’s too strong to conclude that she will only be considered if she mails it 10 days before. Yes, she probably should, but there’s a realistic chance she can mail it 5 days before and it’ll still make it there in time.

“Could take up to X time” isn’t the same as “Will always take X time”.

___________

  1. The argument is talking about what happens if she applies. It does not matter whether she actually does apply.
  2. We’re only discussing regular mail, so express mail doesn’t matter.
  3. CORRECT. The argument isn’t considering the minimum delivery time. If the mail can arrive faster, the conclusion doesn’t follow.
  4. The argument is strictly about timing, it makes no claims about Mary’s competitiveness as an applicant overall.
  5. Multiple issues here. First, we know nothing about express mail. Second, we have no reason to believe express mail is required to make sure your application gets there. There’s no issues presented with regular mail.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 152
Next Question

Section 4 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • Q11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms