LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 155 › Logical Reasoning › Question 7

LSAT 155 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q7

LSAT Preptest 155 explanations

LR Question 7 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Thousands of fossils from the long-extinct dire wolf …

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: Pups younger than 6 months probably did not accompany adults that were scavenging or hunting.

REASONING: Thousands of dire wolf fossils were found in natural tar pits that preserved fossils for millennia. None of these fossils came from pups younger than 6 months old.

ANALYSIS: Sometimes, in a Necessary Assumption question, things will stand out as loose ends – not connected to the argument at all. These are often where the necessary assumption comes in.

Here, the conclusion is about whether pups hunted or scavenged with the adults. But we never hear anything about hunting and scavenging in the argument elsewhere, so how can we conclude that they didn’t hunt or scavenge? All we know about the pups from the argument is that they weren’t trapped in the tar pits, so the correct answer will probably link scavenging and hunting to getting trapped in the tar pits.

___________

  1. This doesn’t allow us to draw the conclusion. If the argument was that the adults didn’t want to bring other wolves that didn’t increase the likelihood of success, then this would be a great answer.
  2. This does not help our argument. In fact, if pups can escape the tar pits, then we wouldn’t be able to learn anything from the absence of pup fossils!
  3. We don’t care how many other animals got trapped. We’re specifically comparing dire wolf adults to dire wolf pups.
  4. CORRECT. This takes the absence of pups trapped in the tar pits, and connects it to the conclusion. Dire wolves most often got trapped when hunting and scavenging in the tar pits, and there are no pup fossils that were trapped there. That means the pups probably didn’t go hunting and scavenging.
  5. This answer sounds really good. But we need the best answer, one which allows the conclusion to be drawn. This answer tells us that they often hunted and scavenged in the tar pits. But that doesn’t mean that pups didn’t come along without getting trapped.

Recap: The question begins with “Thousands of fossils from the long-extinct dire wolf “. It is a Necessary Assumption question. Learn how to master LSAT Necessary questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 155
Next Question
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms