LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 158 › Logical Reasoning › Section 2 › Question 21

LSAT 158 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q21

PT158.S2.Q21

LSAT Preptest 158 explanations

LR Question 21 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: A geologist recently claimed to have discovered …

QUESTION TYPE: Weaken

CONCLUSION: Nanobes are probably not living things.

REASONING: They’re too small to contain a reproductive mechanism, which is required for life.

ANALYSIS: The whole argument depends on: if something is too small to contain a reproductive system, then it can’t be alive.

So that’s where you should focus. The author is assuming that a living thing must itself physically contain the machinery needed to reproduce.

Maybe something can still count as living even if it doesn’t have a reproductive system. Maybe reproduction is happening in a different way than the author is imagining.

___________

  1. This doesn’t help much. It tells us some bacteria don’t reproduce sexually, but the argument never said reproduction had to be sexual.
  2. CORRECT. This shows that reproduction can still happen even if the nanobe doesn’t individually have its own reproductive mechanism.
  3. Even if alleged Martian bacteria are the same size, that doesn’t show nanobes can reproduce.
  4. This is tempting, but too vague. Saying earlier definitions used worse microscopes does not show that reproductive mechanisms are not required for life.
  5. Size and simplicity are not the issue by themselves. The argument is specifically about whether something that small could reproduce.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 158
Next Question

Section 2 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • Q21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

More Resources for Weaken Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Weaken questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers weaken questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms