QUESTION TEXT: A geologist recently claimed to have discovered …
QUESTION TYPE: Weaken
CONCLUSION: Nanobes are probably not living things.
REASONING: They’re too small to contain a reproductive mechanism, which is required for life.
ANALYSIS: The whole argument depends on: if something is too small to contain a reproductive system, then it can’t be alive.
So that’s where you should focus. The author is assuming that a living thing must itself physically contain the machinery needed to reproduce.
Maybe something can still count as living even if it doesn’t have a reproductive system. Maybe reproduction is happening in a different way than the author is imagining.
___________
- This doesn’t help much. It tells us some bacteria don’t reproduce sexually, but the argument never said reproduction had to be sexual.
- CORRECT. This shows that reproduction can still happen even if the nanobe doesn’t individually have its own reproductive mechanism.
- Even if alleged Martian bacteria are the same size, that doesn’t show nanobes can reproduce.
- This is tempting, but too vague. Saying earlier definitions used worse microscopes does not show that reproductive mechanisms are not required for life.
- Size and simplicity are not the issue by themselves. The argument is specifically about whether something that small could reproduce.
More Resources for Weaken Questions
- Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Weaken questions.
- Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers weaken questions.

Leave a Reply