LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 158 › Logical Reasoning › Section 2 › Question 9

LSAT 158 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q9

PT158.S2.Q9

LSAT Preptest 158 explanations

LR Question 9 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Scholar: The purpose of a law is to deter certain actions …

QUESTION TYPE: Role in Argument

CONCLUSION: A successful legal system only bans truly intolerable behavior.

REASONING:

  • Laws are supposed to deter (prevent actions by threatening punishment).
  • Deterrence only works if people believe they’ll actually be punished.
  • The more laws you have, the less likely it is someone will be punished.

ANALYSIS: The question is asking what role the first sentence plays in the argument. It’s setting up a starting principle about the purpose of laws, which the rest of the argument builds on.

Information in a stimulus can be categorized into 3 things: conclusion, reasoning, and fluff.

It’s not the conclusion. It’s also not fluff (background context that doesn’t specifically play into the argument).

It’s reasoning or a premise. Those two words are generally synonymous.

___________

  1. There was no implicit conclusion about needing more police officers.
  2. Nope, the conclusion is the main point they’re getting at, which is that you should limit the number of laws.
  3. CORRECT. It’s a starting premise that the rest of the reasoning depends on.
  4. An intermediate conclusion derives from other claims, but this statement is our starting point.
  5. The author agrees with and presents this statement, they’re not trying to discredit it.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 158
Next Question

Section 2 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • Q9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

More Resources for Role in Argument Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Role in Argument questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers role in argument questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms