LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 159 › Logical Reasoning › Section 1 › Question 1

LSAT 159 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q1

PT159.S1.Q1

LSAT Preptest 159 explanations

LR Question 1 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Columnist: The dangers of drinking are greatly exaggerated …

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: The dangers of drinking alcohol for someone’s lifespan are very exaggerated.

REASONING: My grandfather drank a lot his whole life and lived until he was 95.

ANALYSIS: That’s a dumb argument. Just because one anecdotal piece exists to prove otherwise, doesn’t mean the general evidence is exaggerated. One anecdotal case doesn’t prove anything. It’s like arguing this:

My friend eats McDonald’s every day and is in good health. So doctors exaggerate when they say fast food causes health problems.

___________

  1. Irrelevant. The medical press talked about the dangers of drinking, not the morality of drinking. We’re only concerned with whether alcohol shortens your lifespan.
    Example of flaw: Some people say alcohol is immoral. But this is false, because alcohol sales increase GDP.
  2. The argument is that alcohol doesn’t shorten lifespan. So this doesn’t help. We don’t need to prove that something else shortens lifespan in order to get alcohol off the hook.
     
    This answer would only fit as a flaw when there is an obvious alternate explanation that an author is ignoring.
    Example of flaw: This man is clearly drunk. I see empty whisky bottles nearby, and some fruit. I have heard fermented fruit contains alcohol. So, obviously, this man fermented some fruit, then drank the fermented juice, and got drunk.
  3. The columnist is trying to disprove a claim about lifespan, not quality of life. This flaw doesn’t fit here.
  4. There’s no confusion between cause and effect.
    Example of flaw: People who drink heavily often have high stress levels. So clearly, the drinking is what creates their stress.
  5. CORRECT. A general claim means “alcohol (in general) shortens your lifespan”. An anecdote is evidence about a single case, such as the author’s grandfather. A single person’s situation can’t disprove a general claim.
     
    Alcohol can make people live less long on average even if a single person lives a long time while drinking heavily.
↑ Return to PT 159
Next Question

Section 1 · Logical Reasoning

  • Q1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms