DISCUSSION: Lines 2-6 criticize traditional legal research. It focuses on only a few, arcane cases and it doesn’t help show how the law will affect real people with real problems.
___________
- The author never says whether traditional legal research could improve. Maybe it has very limited potential.
- CORRECT. This nicely sums up lines 2-6. The author prefers the approaches in the third paragraph, which help plaintiffs win cases.
- We’re never told if traditional research led to the use of social science in law.
- Who knows? Maybe traditional research was always terrible and never significant.
- Lines 2-6 show no gratitude, and no evidence that traditional research has produced any unique evidence.
Want a free Reading Comp lesson?
Get a free sample of the Reading Comprehension Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving RC questions
Leave a Reply