DISCUSSION: Paragraph one gives us context for paragraphs two and three. Paragraph two criticizes outcomes analysis while paragraph three shows us better solutions.
___________
- This only describes traditional legal research. Outcomes analysis analyzes all cases, not a limited number.
- The techniques in the third paragraph analyze more factors than outcomes analysis does. But the author thinks these techniques are more successful.
- We only have one example of a flawed technique: Zirkel and Schoenfeld’s use of outcomes analysis. Other scholars may all use good techniques.
- CORRECT. This covers paragraphs two and three. Paragraph two criticizes outcomes analysis, and paragraph three shows us two better techniques.
- The two techniques in paragraph three are promising, but “considerable certainty” may be too high a standard.
Also, this ignores outcomes analysis.
Want a free Reading Comp lesson?
Get a free sample of the Reading Comprehension Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving RC questions
Leave a Reply