LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 102 › Logical Reasoning › Question 20

LSAT 102 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q20

LSAT Preptest 102 explanations

LR Question 20 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Physicist: Determinism is the view that every event…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Determinism isn’t true.

REASONING: We can’t know if determinism is true.

ANALYSIS: This is a bad argument, but the error is common. I don’t know whether determinism is true. But it might be – there’s just no way for us to measure it.

Determinism means that every past moment in your life lead you to this moment, where you’re reading these words.

Don’t let the scientific language confuse you. Subatomic particle just means: really small thing. They’re only important because we can’t measure them fully. That means we can’t measure the full state of the universe. Therefore we can’t know whether determinism is true.

This is a reference to Heisenberg’s uncertainty theory. We can measure either the position or velocity of a particle, but not both.

___________

  1. The physicist never said this. He just said we can’t know both position and velocity of a single particle. He didn’t say anything about measuring position or velocity separately for all particles.
  2. This gets the physicist’s claim backwards. The physicist said that because we can’t fully measure subatomic particles, we can’t fully know the state of the universe.
  3. This is very similar to A. Subatomic particles aren’t that relevant. In any case, the physicist never said anything about measuring position and velocity separately.
  4. CORRECT. The universe might have a complete state, even if we can’t measure it. The physicist judged that determinism was false, but he had no evidence.
  5. Actually, if we can’t measure both position and velocity for any particular particle, then we can’t do that for all particles. It’s a valid logical deduction. It’s like saying: “if any particular human can’t fly, then therefore all humans can’t fly.”

Recap: The question begins with “Physicist: Determinism is the view that every event”. It is a Flawed Reasoning question. Learn more about LSAT Flaw questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 102
Next Question

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms