LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 104 › Logical Reasoning › Question 11

LSAT 104 | Section 1 | Logical Reasoning: Q11

LSAT Preptest 104 explanations

LR Question 11 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: A local chemical plant produces pesticides that can cause sterility…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Parallel Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Pesticides are polluting the river.

REASONING: A chemical plant produces a pesticide that can make otters sterile. Otters in the nearby river became sterile at a much higher rate once the plant opened for business.

ANALYSIS: There are two major problems. First, the plant is “near” the river. But we’re never told if the pesticides reach the river.

Second, note that we only know the pesticide can cause sterility. It might not, and it when it does it might not produce a “dramatic” increase.

We’d have to eliminate the other causes of sterility in otters to know that the pesticide was definitely the cause.

___________

  1. This is a bad argument, but the flaw is different. At least the argument has shown that horses do have tetanus bacteria. The argument is bad because it has failed to show two things:
     
    1. Is it only horses that have tetanus in their digestive tract?
    2. Can tetanus infect an animal if the bacteria are in its digestive tract?
  2. CORRECT. This repeats the two errors. First, we don’t know if the forage is actually low in calcium. Second, even if the forage is low in calcium, we don’t know if its the cause of the decreased egg production. There are many other possible causes of low egg production.
  3. This is a bad argument. We don’t know what the other causes of infection are. Maybe all zoo animals are susceptible to infection, even if well nourished. But this argument doesn’t repeat the two flaws of the stimulus.
  4. This is a bad argument, but the flaw is different. Just because all apes have opposable thumbs, that does not mean that only apes have opposable thumbs. You have opposable thumbs, but you’re not an ape.
  5. This isn’t quite a good argument. Someone might have transported a bear into the area. But the two flaws from the stimulus aren’t repeated.

Recap: The question begins with “A local chemical plant produces pesticides that can cause sterility”. It is a Flawed Parallel Reasoning question. Learn how to master LSAT Flawed Parallel questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 104
Next Question

More Resources for Flawed Parallel Reasoning Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Flaw drills: Practice identifying flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flawed Parallel Reasoning questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flawed parallel reasoning questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms