LR Question 20 Explanation, by LSATHacks
QUESTION TEXT: Shy adolescents often devote themselves totally to…
QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption
CONCLUSION: An all-consuming hobby is not a successful strategy to get over loneliness as a teenager.
REASONING: Sometimes shy adolescents can make friends through a hobby. But if they lost interest in the hobby then they might get even lonelier.
ANALYSIS: This argument isn’t quite good. We don’t know what happens once a teenager drops a hobby and gets lonelier. Maybe they go and make new friends in a bit. Having a hobby might have taught them how to meet people.
___________
- Even if adolescents don’t want more friends they may still lose the friends they have if they abandon the hobby.
- CORRECT. If a successful strategy for getting past loneliness can intensity that loneliness then perhaps a hobby can be a successful strategy even though it could make you lonelier.
- It doesn’t matter what adolescents do if they don’t make any friends from a hobby. The strategy has failed in that case.
- This doesn’t have to be true. Perhaps no strategy is successful.
- It doesn’t matter why teenagers start hobbies. The question is: will the hobbies help them make friends?
Free Logical Reasoning lesson
Get a free sample of the Logical Reasoning Mastery Seminar. Learn tips for solving LR questions
Hi, I'm Graeme Blake
I created LSATHacks, and scored a 177 on the LSAT.
Check out LSATHacks All Access
It's your one stop shop for LSAT prep: 1000s more explanations, and courses for both intro and advanced students. Lifetime access to everything on LSATHacks and anything I add. Plus a consult with me to get you started on the right track.
---------
Socials and Updates: If you have any questions, you can can check out my TikTok videos or email me.
For updates, sign up for my email list. I update whenever I have new posts.
I am still confused, because I thought the conclusion is addressing the possibility of losing interest by developing an “all-consuming” hobby ??
The idea is that despite the intention being to reduce the impact of loneliness by developing a hobby, sometimes developing an all consuming hobby can have the opposite effect. The argument isn’t a good one, for the reasons that Graeme mentions, and also because it’s generally unclear why exactly the loneliness is exacerbated.