LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 6 › Logical Reasoning › Question 2

LSAT 6 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q2

LSAT Preptest 6 explanations

LR Question 2 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Physiological research has uncovered disturbing evidence…

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: The data suggest that human anatomy is not meant for the stresses of jogging.

REASONING: Runners suffer from a lot of injuries that seem connected to jogging. A jogger’s level of experience doesn’t matter: beginners and experts alike suffer these injuries.

ANALYSIS: This sounds like a good argument but we would need to now a bit more about whether jogging is actually the cause of the injuries.

Note that the conclusion is about what appears to be true from the data. It does not claim that jogging is actually inappropriate for our anatomy. Rather, it “appears” to be the case based on the data.

This is a subtle distinction, but the LSAT is built around such distinctions.

The researchers don’t tell us if jogging seems to be the cause of the injuries. Simply linking one thing to another does not prove that one causes the other. It is necessary that the data suggest more than a simple correlation: they must also suggest a causal link.

___________

  1. CORRECT. This answer choice may seem flawed because it said the link only “appears to be causal.” You might think it is necessary that jogging actually does cause injuries. But the conclusion is only that the data “suggest” our anatomy isn’t meant for jogging. In that case, we only need to know whether the data also merely “suggest” a causal link.
  2. Since the conclusion is only about the effects of jogging it doesn’t matter if other sports are better or worse.
  3. The argument actually states that experience isn’t a factor.
  4. This could be true but it isn’t a necessary assumption. Maybe every sport seems dangerous.
  5. It could be that we are durable but jogging is especially destructive.

Recap: The question begins with “Physiological research has uncovered disturbing evidence”. It is a Necessary Assumption question. Learn more about LSAT Necessary questions in our guide to LSAT Logical Reasoning question types.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 6
Next Question

More Resources for Necessary Assumption Questions

  • Negations Article: Learn about negations on the LSAT.
  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • Negations Drill: Practice your negation skills.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Necessary Assumption questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers necessary assumption questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms