LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 140 › Logical Reasoning › Question 18

LSAT 140 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q18

LSAT Preptest 140 explanations

LR Question 18 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: A recent magazine article argued that most companies…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: Most businesses that currently don’t have videoconferencing would benefit by buying it.

REASONING: Most companies that have bought videoconferencing equipment have benefitted.

ANALYSIS: This argument has a sample bias. It’s possible that the businesses that bought videoconferencing equipment knew they would benefit from it.

Meanwhile, the businesses that haven’t bought it have no use for videoconferencing, so they know they wouldn’t benefit.

___________

  1. Not quite. The argument said that many businesses actually did benefit from the equipment, so the argument is stronger than this answer choice implies.
    Example of flaw: Many businesses pay for expensive lunches for their managers. So clearly these lunches are worth the cost.
  2. This describes a mistaken reversal of a conditional statement. The argument didn’t do this. You should never pick this type of answer unless you’ve found a conditional reasoning error in the argument.
    Example of flaw: Video conferencing will help businesses. So anything that isn’t video conferencing won’t help businesses.
  3. This is a different flaw.
    Example of flaw: Johnson said the free money making machine will be useful because he likes the color of the machine. Johnson has made a stupid argument. Therefore it’s not a good idea to take the free money making machine.
  4. CORRECT. See the explanation above. Businesses that bought the equipment probably knew they had a use for it. Meanwhile, businesses that haven’t bought it probably realize they don’t have a use for it.
  5. This is a different flaw. The argument didn’t compare cost or value.
    Example of flaw: Pizza costs more than water, which is free. So pizza is more useful than water.

Recap: The question begins with “A recent magazine article argued that most”. It is a Flawed Reasoning question. To practice more Flawed Reasoning questions, have a look at the LSAT Questions by Type page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 140
Next Question

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms