LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSATHacks › LSAT Explanations › Preptest 77 › LSAT Preptest 77 Logic Games Explanations › LSAT 77, Game 2 Setup, Ceramic Bowls, LSATHacks

LSAT 77, Game 2 Setup, Ceramic Bowls, LSATHacks

LSAT 77 Explanations

LG Game 2 Setup, by LSATHacks

This is an explanation of the second logic game from Section III of LSAT Preptest 77, the December 2015 LSAT.

Six out of eight ceramic bowls will be displayed in a row and will be numbered one through six (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Each of the bowls was crafted by one of eight potters: Larsen, Mills, Neiman, Olivera, Park, Reigel, Serra, and Vance (L, M, N, O, P, R, S, V).

Game Setup

This is a linear game. It’s not an easy game, but it’s not the hardest sort of game, either. The most important thing is having a clear list of the rules, and not forgetting them. There are five rules in this game, and forgetting even a single rule will prevent you from solving questions.

You should start by drawing the simplest rules directly on the diagram. Rule 4 is the simplest, it says that S can’t go second or fourth:

LSAT Preptest 77, Game 2 Setup, Diagram 1

The fifth rule can also go on the diagram. It says that N doesn’t have to be placed, but if they are placed they’re in slot 5. One way to draw it would be to put “N” under slots 1-4 and 6. But that’s too visually cluttered. Instead, I made up a new symbol for this game: N with a box around it, under slot 5.

LSAT Preptest 77, Game 2 Setup, Diagram 2

To me, this box means “If N goes anywhere, it goes here. But N doesn’t have to go here.”

As you gain confidence in your diagrams, I encourage you to come up with new versions like this for situations where the normal diagrams don’t work so smoothly. You’ll probably come up with different diagrams than me, which is fine, as long as you keep them clear and easy to draw.

The other rules I couldn’t fit on the diagram. Here they are. Note that rule two really means “P is in between O and S”:

LSAT Preptest 77, Game 2 Setup, Diagram 3

Note that OPS is reversible. It can also be SPO. Also, note that V with a circle just means V is random.

I always number the rules that I can’t fit on the main diagram these numbers don’t necessarily correspond to the game rules. They’re just for easy visual reference.

I would normally draw two diagrams, one with R in 1st and one with R in 6th. But in this game, there’s a third possibility: no R. So the situation isn’t constrained enough to warrant making scenarios.

The final step should be to see if there are any deductions. There’s one: P can’t go third. That’s because P has to go between O and S, and S can’t go second or fourth. (S would have to go in one of those spots if P were 3rd).

So we can draw that on the diagram:

LSAT Preptest 77, Game 2 Setup, Diagram 4

A couple other notes:

  • Numbers are important on this game. There are are eight potters total, and six spaces. Many questions force two people out. That means everyone else is in. See question 8 for an example.
  • On some questions I use a line and a comma to indicate where OPS/SPO go. Here’s an example:

LSAT Preptest 77, Game 2 Setup, Diagram 5

That’s from question 7. The purpose of this diagram is to more quickly represent that OPS/SPO fill slots 1-3, in either order. I could draw them in a box with a reversible handle, but this method is faster, and that’s important.

—————
Repeating Games

I’ve written elsewhere about the benefits of repeating games, to solidify your intuition for deductions. Note that the purpose of repeating games is to prove the answers right, so it doesn’t matter if you remember the right answer.

I repeated this game about three days after I first saw it, by which time I had forgotten the answers. I’ve written how long it took me on the second attempt. That time, or a couple minutes above it, is roughly the standard you should be aspiring to – a lot of people take 8-9 minutes on a repeat attempt, get everything right, and pat themselves on the back. But that’s too slow. The faster you go when repeating, the faster you’ll learn to go the first time you see a game.

(I say “a couple minutes above” my time because, after years of teaching the LSAT, I’m really, really fast. You should be almost as fast as me, but you don’t exactly need to match my pace to score -0.)

Note that I had only done part of this game prior to repeating, so my time is probably a bit higher than it normally would be. This game is medium difficulty, rather than hard.

Time on second attempt: 6:12

Previous Question
Table Of Contents
Main Diagram
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Comments

  1. Sam says

    September 21, 2016 at 9:30 pm

    Hi Graeme,
    I’ve been finding your explanations to be extremely helpful overall, thank you!

    I just wanted to point out that you overlooked the inclusion of something in your information which isn’t true:
    “Note also that, after I wrote these explanations, I figured out that OPS/SPO always have to be in. You could divide the game into three scenarios with P in 2nd, 4th or 5th.”
    Unless I am misapplying this statement to the game as a whole, it seems to have slipped through the cracks during editing.

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      November 23, 2016 at 2:05 pm

      Yes, thanks for catching that! The page has been updated.

      Reply
  2. Valerie says

    September 16, 2016 at 5:43 pm

    Hi! Thanks for all your helpful explanations. Question: When you say, “Note also that, after I wrote these explanations, I figured out that OPS/SPO always have to be in” — don’t questions 8, 10, and 11 contradict this? OPS/SPO don’t always have to be in: of those three elements, only O and S must be in.

    Reply
    • Lucas (LSAT Hacks) says Tutor

      November 23, 2016 at 2:14 pm

      Yes, that’s correct! Thanks for your comment, and the page has been updated.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms