LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 117 › Logical Reasoning › Section 4 › Question 7

LSAT 117 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q7

PT117.S4.Q7

LSAT Preptest 117 explanations

LR Question 7 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Since empathy is essential for people to be willing …

QUESTION TYPE: Necessary Assumption

CONCLUSION: Civilized society can’t exist without empathy.

REASONING: Empathy is essential for people to be willing to follow moral codes that sometimes require them to be selfless.

ANALYSIS: The argument is:

Empathy is necessary for people to follow certain moral codes.

So, empathy is necessary for civilized society.

There’s a missing link there. Why would the inability to follow these moral codes destroy civilized society?

The author must be assuming that civilized society requires at least some people to be willing to put others’ interests ahead of their own.

If that wasn’t true, then civilized society could exist without the moral behavior that allegedly requires empathy.

___________

  1. CORRECT. The argument requires assuming that civilized society depends on having people who are sometimes willing to sacrifice their own welfare to help others. Otherwise, it doesn’t matter whether empathy is needed to produce that behavior.
    Negation: Civilized society could exist without people who are willing to be selfless.
  2. Too strong. The argument doesn’t claim that lack of empathy usually leads to harmful actions. Only that empathy is needed for a certain kind of moral behavior.
    Negation: Lack of empathy usually does not lead to detrimental actions.
  3. This is a sufficient condition: If everyone helps others, society will be civilized. But the argument never needs to establish what is sufficient for civilization – only what is necessary.
    Negation: It’s possible for everyone to sometimes help others and yet that society still isn’t civilized.
  4. Two issues here. First, the stimulus talks about “sometimes” requiring people to be selfless, not always requiring people to do so. Also, where the moral codes came from is irrelevant.
    Negation: There have never been any such moral codes in civilized societies.
  5. The stimulus already tells us that empathy is essential for people to be willing to follow certain moral codes. We don’t need a much broader claim that empathetic people generally ignore their own welfare for others.
    Negation: Empathetic people are not generally more likely to put others’ interests ahead of their own.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 117
Next Question

Section 4 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Q7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26

More Resources for Necessary Assumption Questions

  • Negations Article: Learn about negations on the LSAT.
  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • Negations Drill: Practice your negation skills.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Necessary Assumption questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers necessary assumption questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms