QUESTION TEXT: Generally, open discussion of a false and pernicious idea …
QUESTION TYPE: Principle
CONCLUSION: Certain misconceptions can become more popular, not less, when they are openly discussed.
REASONING: They are so appealing that exposure through debate can strengthen them.
ANALYSIS: Usually, debate weakens false ideas. But in this case, the author is saying there’s some misconceptions that become even more attractive precisely because they’re talked about.
So we’re looking for a principle that says debate usually helps expose falsehoods, but not always. It can sometimes help spread them.
___________
- The stimulus does not say or imply anything about suppression of speech. It describes what happens when ideas are discussed, not what governments should do about it.
- This adds a value judgment (“it’s better”) that isn’t in the stimulus.
- This just compares two categories but misses the point about discussion and popularity. The author even uses pernicious ideas and misconceptions somewhat synonymously, but that’s beside their main point.
- CORRECT. While discussion usually exposes bad ideas, it doesn’t always work that way. Sometimes it can spread misconceptions instead of correcting them. So debate doesn’t necessarily lead to a greater acceptance of truth.
- It does say that certain misconceptions are appealing, but not necessarily because they’re false. So this isn’t supported.

Leave a Reply