LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 124 › Logical Reasoning › Question 13

LSAT 124 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q13

LSAT Preptest 124 explanations

LR Question 13 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Researcher: People with certain personality disorders have more…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: TV causes personality disorders.

REASONING: Personality disorders are associated with theta waves, and so is watching television.

ANALYSIS: Our human brains are wired for this error, so remember: correlation does not equal causation. Remember this, even when you’re done studying for the LSAT.

Maybe theta brain waves cause psychopathy. Maybe they don’t. We don’t know, and the stimulus has given us no useful information with which to decide.

Further, we don’t know if TV causes theta brain waves, or if theta waves make us feel like watching TV.

___________

  1. This is a common answer choice, and often correct. But not here. “Personality disorder” means the same thing each time it is used.
  2. That would have been useful, but it’s not the flaw. Even if we knew what theta waves were, it wouldn’t prove the conclusion.
  3. CORRECT. Yes. For all we know, theta brain waves could occur in a variety of situations that don’t produce psychopathology. The stimulus has not established that they cause anything.
  4. No. An example of this would be if I looked at three people and saw they had theta brain waves, or if I looked only at women, or men, etc.
  5. No, that’s not what they infer – they infer that watching TV is the cause of a personality disorder.

Recap: The question begins with “Researcher: People with certain personality disorders have more”. It is a Flawed Reasoning question. Learn how to master LSAT Flaw questions on the LSAT Logical Reasoning question types page.

Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 124
Next Question

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms