LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 139 › Logical Reasoning › Question 16

LSAT 139 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q16

LSAT Preptest 139 explanations

LR Question 16 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Salespeople always steer customers toward products from…

QUESTION TYPE: Flawed Reasoning

CONCLUSION: The salespeople lie about their products’ quality.

REASONING: The salespeople are paid on commission. They recommend the products which get them the highest commissions.

ANALYSIS: The salesmen certainly have a motive to lie. And it’s suspicious that they only recommend items which earn them the highest commissions.

But, it’s possible the salespeople only make true claims, while still recommending only those products that earn them the highest commissions. There are two ways that this could happen.

  1. Salespeople use true but misleading claims.
  2. The products with the highest commissions are the best products.

So, this argument makes an ad hominem error. We can’t say that salespeople lie just because they have an incentive to lie.

___________

  1. This answer means ‘circular reasoning’, i.e. an argument with no evidence. But the argument did have some (faulty) evidence. It claimed the salespeople couldn’t be trusted because of who they were.
  2. CORRECT. The source of the claims is ‘a salesperson with an incentive to lie to you’.
    You can’t conclude a claim is wrong just because of who said it.
  3. This is a different error. It’s like saying “Dutch people are, on average, taller than the average American adult. Therefore this Dutch baby is taller than the average American adult”.
  4. There was no statement sufficient to prove the conclusion. And the argument never mixed up sufficient and necessary.
  5. Which authority? The stimulus never mentions anyone who is an expert on salespeople, or lying, or any other subject.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 139
Next Question

More Resources for Flaw Questions

  • Flaw drills: Use these to practice making examples of abstract flaws.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Flaw questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers flaw questions.

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms