LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 105 › Logical Reasoning › Section 4 › Question 2

LSAT 105 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q2

PT105.S4.Q2

LSAT Preptest 105 explanations

LR Question 2 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: The blues is a modern musical form whose lyrics …

QUESTION TYPE: Paradox – EXCEPT

PARADOX: Blues songs are about suffering and hardship, but people who perform and listen to them say the overall effect is joyful and life-affirming.

ANALYSIS: The content is sad and painful. Yet the experience is positive and uplifting.

If I go through something tough, but rant about that experience to my loved ones, maybe the experience itself can still be tough but the process of sharing it might still be good!

So something that resolves the paradox will tell us how creating music is cathartic or relieves pain. The answer that doesn’t explain this is our correct answer.

___________

  1. If the blues bring people together and create a sense of community, then songs about suffering can still have an uplifting effect.
  2. CORRECT. This tells us something about what makes musicians successful. It says nothing about why performing or listening to sad songs feels joyful or life-affirming.
  3. Humor and perspective can make painful experiences easier to bear and even affirming.
  4. Knowing you’re not alone can turn songs about suffering into a source of comfort and hope.
  5. Catharsis directly explains how expressing sadness through art can produce positive feelings.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 105
Next Question

Section 4 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • Q2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

More Resources for Paradox Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Paradox questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers paradox questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms