LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 105 › Logical Reasoning › Section 4 › Question 25

LSAT 105 | Section 4 | Logical Reasoning: Q25

PT105.S4.Q25

LSAT Preptest 105 explanations

LR Question 25 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Some residents of Midville claim that …

QUESTION TYPE: Identify the Conclusion

ANALYSIS: Look for conclusion indicator words. “But” is a common one. The first sentence says “but these people are mistaken”.

What do “these people” say? They claim Midville is generally more expensive than neighboring towns.

So if these people are mistaken, then the author must be arguing that: Midville is generally not more expensive than neighboring towns.

The rest of the stimulus is justifying why it isn’t more expensive:

  1. Midville residents receive a lot of services from their high taxes, e.g. trash removal, rent/mortgage assistance, public transportation
  2. In neighboring towns, you have to pay for this stuff yourself

___________

  1. CORRECT. This directly paraphrases the author’s conclusion that the residents claiming otherwise are mistaken.
  2. This is somewhat implied, since some residents think Midville is more expensive and those residents focus on the high tax rates. But it’s too far to conclude that they think their taxes are too high. Either way, it’s not the author’s main point. It’s part of the opposition’s thoughts.
  3. The author never makes a general principle about public services always being cheaper than privately funded ones. The argument is specifically about Midville compared with nearby towns.
  4. We know some residents ignore the services when assessing overall cost, but it’s too strong to claim that they’re unaware of the services at all. I’d imagine people would know whether they’re paying for trash removal or not.
  5. We are never told how many residents use these services, let alone that most residents use all of them.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 105

Section 4 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • Q25

More Resources for Identify the Conclusion Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Identify the Conclusion questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers identify the conclusion questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms