LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 128 › Logical Reasoning › Section 3 › Question 1

LSAT 128 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q1

LSAT Preptest 128 explanations

LR Question 1 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: In a transportation company, a certain syndrome …

QUESTION TYPE: Strengthen

CONCLUSION: The work in Department F is more stressful than other departments.

REASONING: A syndrome often attributed to stress is more prevalent in Department F than any other department.

ANALYSIS: The argument assumes that the syndrome’s higher prevalence in Department F is due to the stressfulness of the work rather than other potential factors. But correlation doesn’t guarantee causation. There could be alternative explanations. Maybe there’s a preexisting condition, or the workers in Department F happen to all have stressful personal lives.

To strengthen the argument, we need evidence that stress is indeed the causal factor and, specifically, stress from Department F’s work. The strongest support would come from information demonstrating a direct link between Department F and the onset of the syndrome.

And remember, we only need to strengthen the claim. Not prove it 100% true.

___________

  1. You might be thinking if Department F has more employees, there’s naturally more people with the syndrome. This is a trap. The argument says that Department F has a higher percentage. So the absolute number of employees has no impact on the argument.
  2. This weakens the argument. If there are multiple potential causes of the syndrome, we have less reason to believe that stress from Department F is the cause.
  3. CORRECT. This provides direct evidence of a causal relationship between working in Department F and the syndrome. If workers who previously did not suffer from the syndrome begin to develop it after transferring to Department F, this suggests that something about Department F is the cause (most plausibly, higher stress levels). This undermines alternative explanations.
  4. This does not explain why Department F, in particular, has a higher prevalence compared to other departments within the same company.
  5. This presents a company-wide dissatisfaction related to stress, but does not specifically support the claim that Department F is the most stressful.
↑ Return to PT 128
Next Question

Section 3 · Logical Reasoning

  • Q1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms