QUESTION TEXT: The number of deer living in North America has increased …
QUESTION TYPE: Paradox
PARADOX: Despite the increase of factors we’d expect to reduce the population of deer, the number of deer has actually dramatically increased.
ANALYSIS: There are things we’d expect to overall reduce the population of deer – or at the very least, stay the same – yet it’s actually dramatically increased.
- People hunt deer the same amount (so it’s not like people hunt less, therefore more deer)
- There are more predators of deer now (so more animals hunting deer now)
- Suburban expansion is encroaching on where deer live (this could be damaging to the population of deer)
To resolve the paradox, we need a factor that explains why the deer population has grown despite such pressures. The best explanation will offset or outweigh the expected decline.
___________
- CORRECT. Deer populations have dramatically increased since the 1960s. So if, in the 70s, a pesticide that negatively impacted wildlife was banned, this likely means the population started recovering and growing. This provides a good explanation for why the deer population increased despite the other pressures.
- This might help slow (not eradicate) habitat loss, but it doesn’t explain the overall dramatic increase.
- We already know hunters “kill no fewer deer today”. This means that hunting levels have stayed the same, so a reduction in the number of hunters doesn’t explain why the population overall has grown.
- This explains why there’s more wolves. We want to know why there’s more deer.
- This could suggest why deer populations might decline in the future. But it doesn’t explain why their numbers increased in the first place.

Leave a Reply