QUESTION TEXT: Those who participate in risky sports often do so to …
QUESTION TYPE: Weaken
CONCLUSION: Confronting fears increases self-confidence.
REASONING:
- People often participate in risky sports to confront their fears
- Those who participate in such risk-taking activities have more self-confidence than others
ANALYSIS: The argument establishes a correlation between participating in risky sports, confronting fears, and self-confidence. Based on this correlation, it concludes causation. But we know by now that correlation does not necessarily mean causation.
To weaken the argument, we need to show that self-confidence is not necessarily a result of confronting fears through risky sports. It may stem from another cause, such as preexisting self-confidence. Maybe people who engage in risky sports are more self-confident to begin with (before even starting). This would undermine the causal link that the argument tries to claim.
___________
- This doesn’t weaken the argument because it doesn’t challenge the idea that confronting fears increases self-confidence. The argument assumes people knowingly confront their fears, but even if they don’t, this doesn’t refute the claim that confronting fears builds confidence. It could just be an unintended benefit.
- CORRECT. This shows that self-confidence isn’t a result of confronting fears but instead a preexisting trait. If participants were already confident before engaging in risky activities, then their confidence can’t be attributed to confronting fears.
- This is irrelevant. We’re concerned with the effects of engaging in risky sports on confidence, not why people avoid such sports.
- The argument never claims risky sports are the only method of fear confrontation. So this doesn’t weaken the claim that confronting fears (through risky sports or otherwise) increases confidence.
- The beliefs of non-participants do not necessarily affect whether those who participate gain self-confidence from confronting fears.

Leave a Reply