LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › Preptest 128 › Logical Reasoning › Section 3 › Question 5

LSAT 128 | Section 3 | Logical Reasoning: Q5

LSAT Preptest 128 explanations

LR Question 5 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Those who participate in risky sports often do so to …

QUESTION TYPE: Weaken

CONCLUSION: Confronting fears increases self-confidence.

REASONING:

  1. People often participate in risky sports to confront their fears
  2. Those who participate in such risk-taking activities have more self-confidence than others

ANALYSIS: The argument establishes a correlation between participating in risky sports, confronting fears, and self-confidence. Based on this correlation, it concludes causation. But we know by now that correlation does not necessarily mean causation.

To weaken the argument, we need to show that self-confidence is not necessarily a result of confronting fears through risky sports. It may stem from another cause, such as preexisting self-confidence. Maybe people who engage in risky sports are more self-confident to begin with (before even starting). This would undermine the causal link that the argument tries to claim.

___________

  1. This doesn’t weaken the argument because it doesn’t challenge the idea that confronting fears increases self-confidence. The argument assumes people knowingly confront their fears, but even if they don’t, this doesn’t refute the claim that confronting fears builds confidence. It could just be an unintended benefit.
  2. CORRECT. This shows that self-confidence isn’t a result of confronting fears but instead a preexisting trait. If participants were already confident before engaging in risky activities, then their confidence can’t be attributed to confronting fears.
  3. This is irrelevant. We’re concerned with the effects of engaging in risky sports on confidence, not why people avoid such sports.
  4. The argument never claims risky sports are the only method of fear confrontation. So this doesn’t weaken the claim that confronting fears (through risky sports or otherwise) increases confidence.
  5. The beliefs of non-participants do not necessarily affect whether those who participate gain self-confidence from confronting fears.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 128
Next Question

Section 3 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Q5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms