LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 129 › Logical Reasoning › Section 2 › Question 12

LSAT 129 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q12

PT129.S2.Q12

LSAT Preptest 129 explanations

LR Question 12 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Criminologist: The main purpose of most criminal organizations

QUESTION TYPE: Sufficient Assumption

CONCLUSION: Criminal organizations will get involved in biotech.

REASONING: Criminal organizations want profits. Biotech has profits.

ANALYSIS: This is a silly argument, but no matter. Our job is to fix it.

The flaw is assuming that criminal organizations will get involved in any activity that generates profits. That’s ridiculous. Their purpose is profits, but that doesn’t mean they’ll involve themselves in every profitable sector. That’s spreading yourself thin.

But we’re supposed to fix the argument. So if we say that the mafia will get involved in any industry that promises profits, then we can say that the mafia will get involved in biotech.

I didn’t draw this when I solved it. I tried making a drawing for this explanation, but I couldn’t easily fit things into a diagram. If a drawing is too hard to do, I don’t bother making one. The purpose of diagrams is to make your life easier, not harder.

___________

  1. This gets things backwards. It tells us what makes an organization interested in profits. That’s useless. We already know that criminal organizations want profits.
  2. There are two problems here. First, we don’t know if awareness is necessary for getting involved, or guarantees getting involved. (People can do things without being consciously aware of the reasons.)
    Second, this only says “some” organizations, whereas the conclusion is about criminal organizations in general.
  3. This sounds very promising, but look closely at the conclusion. It says criminal organizations will become “increasingly” involved in biotech.
    This answer says that criminal organizations are already involved, due to the profits. So now we have no reason for thinking that criminal organizations will get even more involved. Profits were the only possible motive, and now this answer says criminal organizations have already accounted for profits.
  4. CORRECT. Criminal organizations have profits as their purpose. This answer tells us that those organizations will increase their involvement in any industry that promises profits. And biotech promises profits.
    So we can conclude that criminal organizations will try to get more involved in biotech.
  5. “Willing” doesn’t cut it. You may be willing to do many things you’ll never end up doing. We need an answer that says criminal organizations are actually going to become involved.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 129
Next Question

Section 2 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • Q12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26

More Resources for Sufficient Assumption Questions

  • Conditional Reasoning Article: Learn about conditional statements.
  • LR Diagrams Guide: Learn how to draw LR diagrams.
  • Intro to Conditional Reasoning: Learn conditional reasoning basics.
  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Sufficient Assumption questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers sufficient assumption questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms