LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 129 › Logical Reasoning › Section 2 › Question 2

LSAT 129 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q2

PT129.S2.Q2

LSAT Preptest 129 explanations

LR Question 2 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Long-distance runners use two different kinds of cognitive

QUESTION TYPE: Complete the Argument

CONCLUSION: Runners shouldn’t use associative strategies before a race.

REASONING: Associative strategies lead to mental exhaustion that lasts over a day. It’s important for long distance runners to be mentally refreshed at the start of a race.

ANALYSIS: Most of this argument is fluff. You don’t need to know that associative strategies focus on physical sensations and dissociative strategies ignore them.

All you need to do is focus on the logic at the end: associative strategies are exhausting. And runners need to be refreshed at the start of a race.

So this means that prior to a race, runners shouldn’t use these strategies.

___________

  1. CORRECT. This matches exactly. Associative strategies will exhaust a runner if they use them before a race. So runners should save these strategies for the race itself.
  2. This we don’t know. The only problem with associative strategies is that they exhaust runners after they’re used. But it’s possible that associative strategies are effective during a race, even with no prior training.
  3. There are two problems with this answer:
    1. The argument gave us no reason to believe that alternating is the superior strategy.
    2. This answer doesn’t respond to the argument’s logic. It ignores the point about associative strategies being tiring.
  4. The argument did not say whether long distance runners tend to use both strategies or only one. This answer has zero support.
  5. Careful. We don’t know what’s effective in training. We only know that immediately before a race it is a bad idea to waste your energy on associative strategies.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 129
Next Question

Section 2 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • Q2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26

More Resources for Identify the Conclusion Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Identify the Conclusion questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers identify the conclusion questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms