LSATHacks
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
  • Explanations
  • Tutoring
  • Courses
  • Login
  • Cart
LSAT Explanations › PrepTest 129 › Logical Reasoning › Section 2 › Question 13

LSAT 129 | Section 2 | Logical Reasoning: Q13

PT129.S2.Q13

LSAT Preptest 129 explanations

LR Question 13 Explanation

QUESTION TEXT: Administrators of educational institutions are enthusiastic

QUESTION TYPE: Role in Argument

CONCLUSION: Teachers are wrong to fear computers.

REASONING: Teachers and administrators think that computers will let schools teach more courses with fewer teachers. But actually computerized instruction requires more teaching time.

ANALYSIS: This is a role in argument question, so you are not supposed to look for flaws in the argument. Instead you’re just trying to figure out what the argument is saying.

The statement in question is what administrators (and teachers) believe: administrators think that computers will let them offer more courses with fewer teachers.

The final sentence says that this claim is wrong. So the statement in question is one that the argument proves wrong.

___________

  1. This didn’t happen.
    Example of flaw: Maybe computers will let us have fewer teachers; this would explain something I saw recently. I observed a course where sixty students were on computers and one teacher supervised.
  2. This is completely different.
    Example of flaw: Will computers let us teach more classes with fewer teachers? Let’s examine the evidence.
  3. CORRECT. The final sentence disproves the claim in the first sentence. The sentence “But this is mistaken.” shows that the author disagrees with the previous claim.
    Always watch for “but”, it’s an extremely important word.
  4. Nonsense. The author says “But this is mistaken”, in reference to the first sentence. The author disagrees with this statement.
  5. Same as D. The final sentence is the conclusion, and this sentence shows that the author disagrees with the first sentence.
Previous Question
↑ Return to PT 129

Section 2 · Logical Reasoning

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • Q13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26

More Resources for Role in Argument Questions

  • Intro Course lesson: This intro course lesson covers Role in Argument questions.
  • Mastery Seminar lesson: This LR Mastery seminar lesson covers role in argument questions.
Quick Jump PT Section Que

Hi, I'm Graeme Blake

I scored a 177 on the LSAT. I founded LSATHacks and created the LSAT Mastery Seminars to help students succeed.

I’ve personally written explanations for 5,000+ LSAT questions. If you find these explanations helpful, you'll definitely like our courses.

Join my email list for LSAT study tips and resources.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Free LSAT Email Course

My best LSAT tips, straight to your inbox

Increase Your Score

LSATHacks Courses Aiming For The 170S? See exactly how a top scorer thinks INCREASE YOUR SCORE
“The seminars teach you how to think like a high-scorer so that you can choose the correct answer quickly.” — Jay
“Not only did my score improve but I was able to approach LR with utter confidence” — Kacie L.

Resources

  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Free Email Course
  • LSAT Preptest Converter
  • Experimental Section Checker
  • LSAT Prep Books

About LSATHacks

  • About/Contact
  • Courses
  • Free Trial

Community

  • Discord
  • Social Media
  • Webinars
Disclaimer: Use of these explanations requires official LSAT preptests. LSAT is a registered trademark of LSAC.
LSAC does not review or endorse specific test preparation materials or services and has not reviewed this site.

© Copyright 2026 LSATHacks. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy | Terms